-
Hei
Vi i Foreningen Flyprat ønsker takke de av dere som har valgt å være medlem av foreningen gjennom det siste året, og dermed støttet driften av Flyprats forum og Airpics med 150kr.
Vi håper å kunne ha deg videre med til neste år og at du fortsatt vil være medlem nå som nytt medlemsår begynte 1. oktober 2025
Merk at etter årsmøtevedtaket er medlemsavgiften fra og med i år 150krBetalingen kan enten gjøres via Vipps: 150kr til #18641 eller via Letsreg på linken under:
https://www.letsreg.com/no/event/medlemskontingent_2026_01102025
(Husk og oppgi brukernavn så betalingen kan linkes til brukeres)
De av dere som alt har betalt i oktober er selvsagt registrert i det nye medlemsåret
Med vennlig hilsen - Styret i Foreningen Flyprat
DY EI-FHF/LN-NOB - status
- Thread starter GF1
- Start date
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Fløy ikke JetBlue med en slik umalt maskin i en kort periode? Kanskje Norwegian skal gjøre det samme
Fløy ikke JetBlue med en slik umalt maskin i en kort periode? Kanskje Norwegian skal gjøre det samme
sail4fun
ScanFlyer Mile High Club
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Også uten at DY'purken tok han ?
Spøk til side, skal bli artig med nye fly også hos DY.
Også uten at DY'purken tok han ?
Spøk til side, skal bli artig med nye fly også hos DY.
Last edited:
CK
ScanFlyer Mile High Club
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Richard - I do NOT agree with your comments about "secret" info from DY. The websiet referred to by MOW is public, the photos were taken in public. If we as a group of enthusiasts were not to do our fair share of digging (thanks to GFL and others who check the mail-journal of Luftfartstilsynet, and share that info with other "nerds" where would we be? In some respects, fourum members do the work of investigative reporters, finding public information hidden here and there - and doing a great job of it. Mrs Ellingsen would never put the MSN of future aircraft in a press-release, as mentioned just because noboby (other then nreds like us) care.
I appreciate your postings, Richard - but not your constand whining about moderators or other forum members. The last few post I've seen from you, have all included the latter, and it does not become you, my friend.
Richard - I do NOT agree with your comments about "secret" info from DY. The websiet referred to by MOW is public, the photos were taken in public. If we as a group of enthusiasts were not to do our fair share of digging (thanks to GFL and others who check the mail-journal of Luftfartstilsynet, and share that info with other "nerds" where would we be? In some respects, fourum members do the work of investigative reporters, finding public information hidden here and there - and doing a great job of it. Mrs Ellingsen would never put the MSN of future aircraft in a press-release, as mentioned just because noboby (other then nreds like us) care.
I appreciate your postings, Richard - but not your constand whining about moderators or other forum members. The last few post I've seen from you, have all included the latter, and it does not become you, my friend.
BU662
critical mind
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
You totally missed the boat CK, absolutely.
The info that MOW is referring to is public. If you would have followed a bit the history of Seattle deliveries and their blog, you would have noticed that they do also not post any line-Numbers nor MSN than the next 100 off the line. The fact is that some customers, namely big Leasing companies are not happy to see those things revealed.
What is valued a company inside information, depends on who'm you ask. But Norwegian has e.g. not leaked out further information via L-T. Postjournal about their future used 737s. They could have done, but they kept it secret.
Last word to what you call Whining about a Morderator.
If your attitude is that this forum stands for pathetic DY Bashing like "oh another used tampon" then it is absolutely clear to me that this is no longer an objective forum. You can't say you want objective information on the one hand and does not stop such stupid postings on the other hand.
So if your choice is that P.A.Viking shall continue with such stupid DY Bashing, and nothing else it was, then I request my account to be terminated!
You totally missed the boat CK, absolutely.
The info that MOW is referring to is public. If you would have followed a bit the history of Seattle deliveries and their blog, you would have noticed that they do also not post any line-Numbers nor MSN than the next 100 off the line. The fact is that some customers, namely big Leasing companies are not happy to see those things revealed.
What is valued a company inside information, depends on who'm you ask. But Norwegian has e.g. not leaked out further information via L-T. Postjournal about their future used 737s. They could have done, but they kept it secret.
Last word to what you call Whining about a Morderator.
If your attitude is that this forum stands for pathetic DY Bashing like "oh another used tampon" then it is absolutely clear to me that this is no longer an objective forum. You can't say you want objective information on the one hand and does not stop such stupid postings on the other hand.
So if your choice is that P.A.Viking shall continue with such stupid DY Bashing, and nothing else it was, then I request my account to be terminated!
CK
ScanFlyer Mile High Club
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Richard - get off your horse! This forum is away with DY-bashing, as well as SAS-bashing and Ryanair-bashing..... But also - believe me - by strong positive feelings about a number of companies, as well as the industry as a whole. I personally prefer SAS, but other prefer differently - also in amongst the moderators, and that is beside the point. I have great respect for Norwegian Air Shuttle, what they have acieved in five years and the utmost respect and admiration for the people who work there. But I still think their aircraft look like a circumcized penis! I love the 737-600, but I can agree that it does resemble a pig...
It IS possible to both discuss the airline industry, and disagree on certain points, and be "professional" - but also to do it with slight humour. As for my "neighbour" P.A. Viking - I assume he sometimes goes a bit over the top just for the fun of it. You can like it or not.
Richard - get off your horse! This forum is away with DY-bashing, as well as SAS-bashing and Ryanair-bashing..... But also - believe me - by strong positive feelings about a number of companies, as well as the industry as a whole. I personally prefer SAS, but other prefer differently - also in amongst the moderators, and that is beside the point. I have great respect for Norwegian Air Shuttle, what they have acieved in five years and the utmost respect and admiration for the people who work there. But I still think their aircraft look like a circumcized penis! I love the 737-600, but I can agree that it does resemble a pig...
It IS possible to both discuss the airline industry, and disagree on certain points, and be "professional" - but also to do it with slight humour. As for my "neighbour" P.A. Viking - I assume he sometimes goes a bit over the top just for the fun of it. You can like it or not.
sail4fun
ScanFlyer Mile High Club
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Takk, men selv syntes jeg at min såkalte DY-Bashing er "ikke eksisterende" , og om noen ansatte i DY føler seg støtt så er jeg oppriktig lei meg for det. Jeg mener dog at min kommentar i går, og din misstolkning av den må tilskrives kulturelle/språklig bias.
Takk, men selv syntes jeg at min såkalte DY-Bashing er "ikke eksisterende" , og om noen ansatte i DY føler seg støtt så er jeg oppriktig lei meg for det. Jeg mener dog at min kommentar i går, og din misstolkning av den må tilskrives kulturelle/språklig bias.
Last edited:
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
This forum consists of 1300-odd users, and it never has been objective. People have differing opinions, and it will remain such untill the end of time/aviation/this forum (feel free to pick).
I can assign it a random password, and then you can use the password reset function at some point next week when you get over yourself?
-A
This forum consists of 1300-odd users, and it never has been objective. People have differing opinions, and it will remain such untill the end of time/aviation/this forum (feel free to pick).
I can assign it a random password, and then you can use the password reset function at some point next week when you get over yourself?
-A
Last edited:
Tommy777
ScanFlyer Mile High Club
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Totally. On this forum all airlines get their fair share of bashing.
Comment that should go via PM IMO..
Totally. On this forum all airlines get their fair share of bashing.
Comment that should go via PM IMO..
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
In normal circumstances, very much so. Seeing how BU662 has had a few of these "I'll-leave-now-and-very-publically" moments, and after how he managed to demand his entire past erased from the forum, only to show up a few weeks later and seemingly on the verge of repeating this now, I figured it would serve better to wish him the best of luck and point out he'll be back next week.
Or we could actully take his word for it and do what he bids. Either way works.
-A
In normal circumstances, very much so. Seeing how BU662 has had a few of these "I'll-leave-now-and-very-publically" moments, and after how he managed to demand his entire past erased from the forum, only to show up a few weeks later and seemingly on the verge of repeating this now, I figured it would serve better to wish him the best of luck and point out he'll be back next week.
Or we could actully take his word for it and do what he bids. Either way works.
-A
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
BU662, I've enjoyed your comments, and actually been rather amazed at your Norwegian language skills over these last few years. It's rather interesting to see someone who speaks a totally different and rather large language actually bother to sit down and learn a miniscule language such as Norwegian. Hope you stay on at Scanair.no
I'm with P.A. Viking, I don't like the Norwegian livery, and the "Used tampon" has been used as a slang term for the DY livery. Not very flattering, but there you go. I'm sure it's not just us Norwegians who refer to it that way.
On another note, since you read and write good Norwegian, do you prefer to be answered in Norwegian or English when you resort to English on the forum?
BU662, I've enjoyed your comments, and actually been rather amazed at your Norwegian language skills over these last few years. It's rather interesting to see someone who speaks a totally different and rather large language actually bother to sit down and learn a miniscule language such as Norwegian. Hope you stay on at Scanair.no
I'm with P.A. Viking, I don't like the Norwegian livery, and the "Used tampon" has been used as a slang term for the DY livery. Not very flattering, but there you go. I'm sure it's not just us Norwegians who refer to it that way.
On another note, since you read and write good Norwegian, do you prefer to be answered in Norwegian or English when you resort to English on the forum?
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Kan det være at Norwegian vil bruke samme 'kjendis' på flere fly?
Kan det være at Norwegian vil bruke samme 'kjendis' på flere fly?
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Enda et bilde av LN-NOB:
http://flickr.com/photos/65483667@N00/2166832373/
Enda et bilde av LN-NOB:
http://flickr.com/photos/65483667@N00/2166832373/
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Da er det vel en bedre ide å heller klistre på en eller annen logo på halen på de som er white-tails. For meg er det nesten en gåte hvorfor ikke DY har gjort dette. Bare fordi SAS Norge har flydd rundt med "halvferdige" de siste 4 årene så behøver jo ikke DY gjøre det samme
Da er det vel en bedre ide å heller klistre på en eller annen logo på halen på de som er white-tails. For meg er det nesten en gåte hvorfor ikke DY har gjort dette. Bare fordi SAS Norge har flydd rundt med "halvferdige" de siste 4 årene så behøver jo ikke DY gjøre det samme
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
-NOC er og på sin jomfrutur , men som EC-ICD foreløpig.
-NOC er og på sin jomfrutur , men som EC-ICD foreløpig.
