DY EI-FHF/LN-NOB - status
- Thread starter GF1
- Start date
Fry
ScanFlyer Silver
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Æsj, at de ikke kunne forbedret liveryet når de endelig tok imot nye fly. Er drittlei de fargene der, ikke pent for 5 flate øre, og all denne poatriotismen med Real Norwegians kjenner jeg meg ikke igjen i. Følg med i tiden, Norwegian! Mal om flyene deres, det trengs! var noen som nevnte at de ser ut som en brukt tampong, og siden den gang er det det eneste jeg forbinder med Norwegian sitt dekor...
Æsj, at de ikke kunne forbedret liveryet når de endelig tok imot nye fly. Er drittlei de fargene der, ikke pent for 5 flate øre, og all denne poatriotismen med Real Norwegians kjenner jeg meg ikke igjen i. Følg med i tiden, Norwegian! Mal om flyene deres, det trengs! var noen som nevnte at de ser ut som en brukt tampong, og siden den gang er det det eneste jeg forbinder med Norwegian sitt dekor...
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Ser det er en del lignelser om designet på Norwegians gamle og nye fly (både i denne tråden og andre), og forbausende mange av dem ligger i samme gate, dvs. et sted ved mellomgulvet hos mennesker og dyr. Mulig det er slik at det hodet er fullt av, renner tastaturet over med ;-)
Ser det er en del lignelser om designet på Norwegians gamle og nye fly (både i denne tråden og andre), og forbausende mange av dem ligger i samme gate, dvs. et sted ved mellomgulvet hos mennesker og dyr. Mulig det er slik at det hodet er fullt av, renner tastaturet over med ;-)
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Sant, sant... Når du sier det. NOC'en er jo faktisk fra 2001... Her er litt bilder for de som er interessert.
Har den TV-skjermer?
Sant, sant... Når du sier det. NOC'en er jo faktisk fra 2001... Her er litt bilder for de som er interessert.
Har den TV-skjermer?
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Den har TV-skjermer i taket slik som LN-NOB har.
Fløy EC-ICD til TFS i 2003, og mener det var skjermer for hver 5 rad hvis jeg ikke husker helt feil.
Mener å ha hørt at de nye flyene til Norwegian skulle få skjermer i hver seterygg?
Men NOB'en har ikke det etter det jeg så av bildene jeg tok av den igår innvendig.
Kanskje dette ikke kommer på før de maskinene Norwegian skal eie selv?
Airbus 330.
Den har TV-skjermer i taket slik som LN-NOB har.
Fløy EC-ICD til TFS i 2003, og mener det var skjermer for hver 5 rad hvis jeg ikke husker helt feil.
Mener å ha hørt at de nye flyene til Norwegian skulle få skjermer i hver seterygg?
Men NOB'en har ikke det etter det jeg så av bildene jeg tok av den igår innvendig.
Kanskje dette ikke kommer på før de maskinene Norwegian skal eie selv?
Airbus 330.
Last edited:
AirbusTrond
ScanFlyer Mile High Club
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Hehe, ja hvis DY-fly ser ut som en omskåret penis, hva ser da et ikke-DY-fly egentlig ut som? Og hva er da en fly-spotter... ? ^_^
Hehe, ja hvis DY-fly ser ut som en omskåret penis, hva ser da et ikke-DY-fly egentlig ut som? Og hva er da en fly-spotter... ? ^_^
tabrenna
ScanFlyer Blue
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Godt det ikke er MD-80/90 de flyr rundt med da.. :colgate:
Godt det ikke er MD-80/90 de flyr rundt med da.. :colgate:
BU662
critical mind
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Could please someone of the Moderator-Corps take out all the pubertary postings on what certain forum members do associate Norwegians livery with and simply put it into a own topic "Does Norwegian need a new livery?" or "How does Norwegian planes look like?"!
I personally think it is a big shame if such a discussion is done here. Either we want to discuss facts and increase knowledge, or those that post this pubertary stuff here, want to continue here in general chat.
Given the fact that this is a public forum I have difficulties to understand that grown up persons can post such childish stuff in here. Do you ever consider that this is read somewhere and how people think about you? I mean, such levels of discussions I had when I was 12 or 14, but not when I did pass the 20 mark. I really do hope that the CEO's of GONow, SAS and some other companies don't sneak in here. They could question themselves "What kind of phantasy do our employees have???"
-------------------
Back to the topic:
Norwegian announced that they take 11 leased 737-800 between 2008 and 2010. These aircraft are not owned nor ordered by Norwegian and are activated on the balance sheets of the respective leasing companies, and not on Norwegians balance sheet. Not necessarily all of these aircraft are factory new.
I guess if someone wants to have a fair impression on how negotiations on such leasing aircraft and the property status are going, please search for one of the first posts of our Forum Member "OJB" who did describe this in a superb posting with the former LN-NOR of Norway Airlines back in the 1980s.
Breakdown of the 11 leased aircraft (according to Norwegian Press release from 11th May 2007).
7 in 2008
3 in 2009
1 in 2010
Prior to the order of the 42 737-800s, which will be owned, Norwegian did reserve the Registration marks LN-NOB til LN-NOH (7 units). Pling pling pling:9:, look a few lines higher and see with which number that co-incidences. No further assignments have been done so far in the NO* series.
LN-NOC is currently at BUD.
To write "venter for (mis)bruk" shows just that some people have no clue why this bird is in BUD. Definately not for storage or abuse. BUD is a pretty good Maintenance place and since the aircraft comes off lease from Air Europa, it has to be handed over to the leasing company by the lessee in a per-contract agreed condition. In order to achieve this, the bird has been send over to BUD to have Maintenance work carried out there. It was ferried to Budapest on Air Europe Flight number. So it did not have its "jomfru-tour" yet, despite the livery.
LN-NOF is revealed as MSN on the Seattle-deliveries.
They do not reveal the MSN chronologically, but as they approach delivery in sequence with their line number. Only the nearest 100-200 MSN are open for the 737 line. The line-number will be published later, usually no more than 20-50 of the nearest future Line-Numbers are published.
LN-NOD & LN-NOE:
You all want to know, don't you? But sorry, it is still secret. Call it spotter-uvennlig or whatever you like... Sometimes someones gotta wait.
I would really appriciate if the discussion could go on as straight-on-top only.
Could please someone of the Moderator-Corps take out all the pubertary postings on what certain forum members do associate Norwegians livery with and simply put it into a own topic "Does Norwegian need a new livery?" or "How does Norwegian planes look like?"!
I personally think it is a big shame if such a discussion is done here. Either we want to discuss facts and increase knowledge, or those that post this pubertary stuff here, want to continue here in general chat.
Given the fact that this is a public forum I have difficulties to understand that grown up persons can post such childish stuff in here. Do you ever consider that this is read somewhere and how people think about you? I mean, such levels of discussions I had when I was 12 or 14, but not when I did pass the 20 mark. I really do hope that the CEO's of GONow, SAS and some other companies don't sneak in here. They could question themselves "What kind of phantasy do our employees have???"
-------------------
Back to the topic:
Norwegian announced that they take 11 leased 737-800 between 2008 and 2010. These aircraft are not owned nor ordered by Norwegian and are activated on the balance sheets of the respective leasing companies, and not on Norwegians balance sheet. Not necessarily all of these aircraft are factory new.
I guess if someone wants to have a fair impression on how negotiations on such leasing aircraft and the property status are going, please search for one of the first posts of our Forum Member "OJB" who did describe this in a superb posting with the former LN-NOR of Norway Airlines back in the 1980s.
Breakdown of the 11 leased aircraft (according to Norwegian Press release from 11th May 2007).
7 in 2008
3 in 2009
1 in 2010
Prior to the order of the 42 737-800s, which will be owned, Norwegian did reserve the Registration marks LN-NOB til LN-NOH (7 units). Pling pling pling:9:, look a few lines higher and see with which number that co-incidences. No further assignments have been done so far in the NO* series.
LN-NOC is currently at BUD.
To write "venter for (mis)bruk" shows just that some people have no clue why this bird is in BUD. Definately not for storage or abuse. BUD is a pretty good Maintenance place and since the aircraft comes off lease from Air Europa, it has to be handed over to the leasing company by the lessee in a per-contract agreed condition. In order to achieve this, the bird has been send over to BUD to have Maintenance work carried out there. It was ferried to Budapest on Air Europe Flight number. So it did not have its "jomfru-tour" yet, despite the livery.
LN-NOF is revealed as MSN on the Seattle-deliveries.
They do not reveal the MSN chronologically, but as they approach delivery in sequence with their line number. Only the nearest 100-200 MSN are open for the 737 line. The line-number will be published later, usually no more than 20-50 of the nearest future Line-Numbers are published.
LN-NOD & LN-NOE:
You all want to know, don't you? But sorry, it is still secret. Call it spotter-uvennlig or whatever you like... Sometimes someones gotta wait.
I would really appriciate if the discussion could go on as straight-on-top only.
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
I follow Richard on NOC, and regarding that aircraft, a Mechanic from DY told me last night that it is undergoing a heavy technical inspection while in BUD and that different types of work and modification will be done on it prior to delivery which is coming up quickly now, so I reckon the aircraft will be looking spotless and almost new when she comes to Norway...
I follow Richard on NOC, and regarding that aircraft, a Mechanic from DY told me last night that it is undergoing a heavy technical inspection while in BUD and that different types of work and modification will be done on it prior to delivery which is coming up quickly now, so I reckon the aircraft will be looking spotless and almost new when she comes to Norway...
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Moderator's official comment:
BU662: All postings and opinions are entirely the responsibility and embarrasment of the poster(s) as long as they don't conflict with any laws. I would recommend that you add the word 'tolerance' to your vocabulary.
//andreas
Moderator's official comment:
BU662: All postings and opinions are entirely the responsibility and embarrasment of the poster(s) as long as they don't conflict with any laws. I would recommend that you add the word 'tolerance' to your vocabulary.
//andreas
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Er det dette som er mest vanlig for flyselskaper? Dvs at flyene regnes som operasjonel leasing og ikke finansiell leasing? (har alltid innbilt meg det motsatt når det kommer til fly, men jeg kan ta feil) Eller kan det skyldes at leiekontrakten i dette tilfellet ikke er lang nok til at det regnes som finansiell leasing siden finansiell leasing skal aktiveres.
Er det dette som er mest vanlig for flyselskaper? Dvs at flyene regnes som operasjonel leasing og ikke finansiell leasing? (har alltid innbilt meg det motsatt når det kommer til fly, men jeg kan ta feil) Eller kan det skyldes at leiekontrakten i dette tilfellet ikke er lang nok til at det regnes som finansiell leasing siden finansiell leasing skal aktiveres.
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
I would embellish this with a repeat of what I told you last time, but for the sake of staying ontopic: as LN-MOW said, we are all different, and we get the credibility we deserve from the quality of how we post. You may or may not agree with this, but that's how the world is in here.
Now, instead of getting into the flinging of adjectives yourself, why not use the facilities at hand, instead of writing a rant and adding mud to the festivities? Use the report button if you find something inappropriate. That does get the attention of all moderators pretty quickly, given the mechanism on that that button does.
Now, as for immature acting on here, you pretty much seem to end up knee-high in the salad on a fairly repetitive basis lately, how about tyding up at home first?
-A
I would embellish this with a repeat of what I told you last time, but for the sake of staying ontopic: as LN-MOW said, we are all different, and we get the credibility we deserve from the quality of how we post. You may or may not agree with this, but that's how the world is in here.
Now, instead of getting into the flinging of adjectives yourself, why not use the facilities at hand, instead of writing a rant and adding mud to the festivities? Use the report button if you find something inappropriate. That does get the attention of all moderators pretty quickly, given the mechanism on that that button does.
Now, as for immature acting on here, you pretty much seem to end up knee-high in the salad on a fairly repetitive basis lately, how about tyding up at home first?
-A
BU662
critical mind
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
I think MOW, you did not understand what I meant:
This is not about tolerance it is about relevance!
In this topic, there are 216 or more postings. If you take a look to the topic title "LN-NOB / jomfrutur" and what is beeind discussed on the last page, you will have to agree that a discussion around the livery is not on-topic at all. I don't have anything against the fact that everyone has its own attitude on the DY livery. It just s***s to read over 50% irrelevant postings in order to come to another posting that has something to do with the actual topic.
I think MOW, you did not understand what I meant:
This is not about tolerance it is about relevance!
In this topic, there are 216 or more postings. If you take a look to the topic title "LN-NOB / jomfrutur" and what is beeind discussed on the last page, you will have to agree that a discussion around the livery is not on-topic at all. I don't have anything against the fact that everyone has its own attitude on the DY livery. It just s***s to read over 50% irrelevant postings in order to come to another posting that has something to do with the actual topic.
CK
ScanFlyer Mile High Club
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Richard - we' ve been over this a million times.
The Scanair Forum is for the users and by the users, and having seen it develop for about 10 years now, in various shapes and forms, I am personally very happy with the healthy mix of "fact & fun" that this forum has found.
We thank you for the insight into the future deliveries of NAX-aircraft, but I am still amazed that you manage to work yourself into a frenzy whenever a joke is made on the expence of the 737 (smågris) or the livery of Norwegian. Lighten up, Richard. It's ok to have a little light-hearted (or call it "pubertary") fun every now and then - I believe I speak for the majority of forum users here. If I - and the rest of the Scanair Forum Team - are mistaken, I will certainly amend my ways.
Richard - we' ve been over this a million times.
The Scanair Forum is for the users and by the users, and having seen it develop for about 10 years now, in various shapes and forms, I am personally very happy with the healthy mix of "fact & fun" that this forum has found.
We thank you for the insight into the future deliveries of NAX-aircraft, but I am still amazed that you manage to work yourself into a frenzy whenever a joke is made on the expence of the 737 (smågris) or the livery of Norwegian. Lighten up, Richard. It's ok to have a little light-hearted (or call it "pubertary") fun every now and then - I believe I speak for the majority of forum users here. If I - and the rest of the Scanair Forum Team - are mistaken, I will certainly amend my ways.
BU662
critical mind
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Well
I simply have to conclude that there is no desire to discuss here. It is making jokes, but where is the relevance? No there is no relevance at all. It is a shame. You say this is jokes.
What I did ask for was simply to split the topic into two, one on the LN-NOB and one on the livery of DY. Is that too difficult. Or shall everything be discussed here under the LN-NOB umbrella. I would suggest we start talking about the weather in SEA, the runways at OSL, the ICAO standard atmosphere and and and ... . All is somehow at some point of the journey related to LN-NOB at some time. But has this really relevance???
Did you ever think about how Norwegian employees feel when the read this "jokes" written in here? Did you ever think about this? No, never. Because it is "funny", and because it is easy to write so since one can hide behind a Nick-Name. Would you talk to your bosses or to same-level colleagues from other companies in that style? No, certainly not.
I did receive Emails from people asking me "what is wrong with **** from the Scanair forum??" In this part PH-NDR is right, you certainly get the credibility you deserve from the quality of how you post. But currently it is a doubtful one...
What I do react on is Pseudo-scientific arguing against the 737. There has been a lot. If there would be someone starting a fact-based discussion 737 vs. 320, I would be one of the first to join in and believe me, I would not hold back to explain why the A319s and A320s are better suited for SAS Danmark given their route structure. But - this is my personal impression - the forum has no desire to discuss on a certain level. Because it is more "funny" to call 737s "smagriser". So come with the arguments, and then we discuss!!! Having done calculations on aircraft types for 7 months now, I can assure you I can give you very hard facts. But postings like "I don't like 737s because they look like pigs and thats why A320s are always superior" I will simply ignore. I admit that a good proportion of technical insight is needed to discuss the pro's and con's or ad- and disadvantages of B737s and A320. And I am sure that people like Dag Johnsen will happily join the discussion - once it is really based on facts.
Well
I simply have to conclude that there is no desire to discuss here. It is making jokes, but where is the relevance? No there is no relevance at all. It is a shame. You say this is jokes.
What I did ask for was simply to split the topic into two, one on the LN-NOB and one on the livery of DY. Is that too difficult. Or shall everything be discussed here under the LN-NOB umbrella. I would suggest we start talking about the weather in SEA, the runways at OSL, the ICAO standard atmosphere and and and ... . All is somehow at some point of the journey related to LN-NOB at some time. But has this really relevance???
Did you ever think about how Norwegian employees feel when the read this "jokes" written in here? Did you ever think about this? No, never. Because it is "funny", and because it is easy to write so since one can hide behind a Nick-Name. Would you talk to your bosses or to same-level colleagues from other companies in that style? No, certainly not.
I did receive Emails from people asking me "what is wrong with **** from the Scanair forum??" In this part PH-NDR is right, you certainly get the credibility you deserve from the quality of how you post. But currently it is a doubtful one...
What I do react on is Pseudo-scientific arguing against the 737. There has been a lot. If there would be someone starting a fact-based discussion 737 vs. 320, I would be one of the first to join in and believe me, I would not hold back to explain why the A319s and A320s are better suited for SAS Danmark given their route structure. But - this is my personal impression - the forum has no desire to discuss on a certain level. Because it is more "funny" to call 737s "smagriser". So come with the arguments, and then we discuss!!! Having done calculations on aircraft types for 7 months now, I can assure you I can give you very hard facts. But postings like "I don't like 737s because they look like pigs and thats why A320s are always superior" I will simply ignore. I admit that a good proportion of technical insight is needed to discuss the pro's and con's or ad- and disadvantages of B737s and A320. And I am sure that people like Dag Johnsen will happily join the discussion - once it is really based on facts.
Lowandslow
ScanFlyer Blue
Re: LN-NOB er paa sin jomfrutur
Hva er det som egentlig er så spesielt med dette?
Det er en helt normal 737-800 som vi ser altfor mange av som det er uansett
Eneste forskjellen er at det er i DY farger, etter min mening ikke så veldig mye å hisse seg opp over akkurat
Er det bare jeg som er av denne oppfatningen eller?
Hva er det som egentlig er så spesielt med dette?
Det er en helt normal 737-800 som vi ser altfor mange av som det er uansett
Eneste forskjellen er at det er i DY farger, etter min mening ikke så veldig mye å hisse seg opp over akkurat
Er det bare jeg som er av denne oppfatningen eller?
