DY SE-RRX/EI-FHU/LN-NGH - status

Re: LN-NGH - status

Sunset said:
Ja nei det går ikke akkurat fort..
I tilfeldig rekkefølge var det dette jeg fant:
NGC skal inn 24/1.
NGE skal inn 29/1.
NGI (som foreløpig skal komme 12/2) skal inn 24/2.
NIC (23/1) skal inn 13/2.
NGJ (7/3) skal inn 18/3.

Så det virker som det går raskere etter hvert i alle fall:)
Click to expand...

Hoppar man över NGD? Inte DYY & DYZ på tur heller?
 
Re: LN-NGH - status

lnngh.jpg


Her er NGH på Værnes tidligere i dag, sola forsvant selvfølgelig noen minutter før......
 
Re: LN-NGH - status

Nytt fly til IBK...
Boeing 737 -8JP 39019 4295 EI-FHU Norwegian Air International re-regd 11dec15, posn / in svc 13-14dec15 OSL-LPA-CPH-LPA ex LN-NGH
Click to expand...
 
Re: EI-FHU/LN-NGH - status

Denne skulle hatt en norsk reg synes jeg..... :p

Boeing 737 -8JP 39019 4295 EI-FHU Norwegian Air International re-regd 11dec15, posn / in svc 13-14dec15 OSL-LPA-CPH-LPA ex LN-NGH
Click to expand...
 
Re: EI-FHU/LN-NGH - status

Da blir EI-FHU til SE-RRX
Siste som FHU er 28/11
Første som RRX er 30/11
 
The Norwegian Group is currently reregistering a lot of planes from the Irish and Norwegian Register to the Swedish.
Is there any particular reason for this?
For example, lower taxes or has this maybe something to do with the future strategy of the Group?
 
RF-4E_348_MTA said:
The Norwegian Group is currently reregistering a lot of planes from the Irish and Norwegian Register to the Swedish.
Is there any particular reason for this?
For example, lower taxes or has this maybe something to do with the future strategy of the Group?
Click to expand...

Most likely due to that they want to transfer NAX-ops in Sweden to NSW-AOC/IATA code LE, and therefor they transfer planes to the NSW-AOC.

The rumors says that Norway-ops will be transferred to NAN-AOC/IATA code DH in the future and that Norwegian will close down NAX-AOC.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your answer :)

So, they want to separate more openly the two AOC's (NAN and NSW).
It is only a little bit strange, that it seems they will abandon their original NAX-AOC and activate the NAN-AOC.
 
Last edited:
If NAN to excist, strange that that AOC now only has 1 acft left, rest xferred to NAX and NSW........DY/NAX are holding the traffic rights by the way, not NAN
 
myhrair said:
Most likely due to that they want to transfer NAX-ops in Sweden to NSW-AOC/IATA code LE, and therefor they transfer planes to the NSW-AOC.

The rumors says that Norway-ops will be transferred to NAN-AOC/IATA code DH in the future and that Norwegian will close down NAX-AOC.
Click to expand...

Thats the old plan - new plan: Hold the LGW slots in NAN as security for the extended bonds. All NAN and eventually all NAI acfts will be transferred to NSW to streamline the AOC structure.

There is practically no need for two similar EU AOCs holding the same route rights, and Ireland was chosen because there was a lack of compatible countries to establish an EU AOC back in 2014/15. With the Cape Town convention came in force in Sweden in 2016, it immediately became the ideal country to hold an EU AOC. Cape Town convention is crucial to avail the best finances for new aircrafts.
 
So, according to the new plan we would have in the future:

D8/IBK - Ireland: Close down
DH/NAN - Norway: Close down
DI/NRS - United Kingdom: Active (Long Haul from LGW)
DN/NAA - Argentina: Active
DY/NAX - Norway: Close down
DU/NLH - Norway: Already closed down in the past
LE/NSW: Sweden: Active (Domestic + Europe + Long Haul (everything except LGW))
 
Wrong !
DY/NAX - Remains Traffic Rights ! (e.g.Russia)
DH/NAN - Remains ufn
D8/IBK - Remains but smaller
 
SE-RRX har gjort sitt hos Norwegian, og ferges til TRD-DUB 9.Sept for utfas/ny operatør
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top