Rules on Pilot & Cabin Crew Fatigue Potentially Unsafe

sail4fun

ScanFlyer Mile High Club
See the ECA/ETF Press Release
Breaking the 'Veil of Silence' – on 5 October, in 22 Countries

On Monday 5 Oct., hundreds of pilots and cabin crew members will be at European airports to inform the public that the EU has scientific evidence that EU rules on air crew fatigue are potentially unsafe. They will hand out fake boarding passes featuring cigarette-style health-warnings, detailed information on crew fatigue, and an explanation as to why EU law must be changed.

One year has passed since the EU received scientific evidence (the 'Moebus report', mandated by the EU itself). It recommends concrete legislative changes to ensure passengers and crew are protected against fatigue-related safety risks. Rather than starting to swiftly change the law, strong airline lobbying paralysed the EU into inaction. ECA and ETF say: 'Brussels' must act NOW!

Striving for highest levels of aviation safety, ETF and ECA have decided to break the 'veil of silence' and go public – at airports, in the media, and towards the EU Institutions.

"This Action Day is the first of a number of possible actions pilots and cabin crew will undertake to highlight the safety risks of crew fatigue. Inaction at EU-level has eventually triggered a reaction from the safety professionals who passengers trust. If the EU does not act, we will." warns Capt. Martin Chalk, President of ECA.

"Flight safety is the core mission of every cabin crew member. But EU-law is insufficient to ensure that air crew can perform their safety role in an alert and effective way. We know this from experience, and scientific evidence confirms it. The EU has been looking the other way for too long. This must change!" says Francois Ballestero, ETF Political Director.

"When the airlines claim there is no need to change EU fatigue rules, you start wondering what their goal is. Yes, stricter fatigue rules – as recommended by the scientists – might cost money. But safety always has a price. Do we need a fatal accident in Europe before actions are taken?" asks Philip von Schöppenthau, Secretary General of ECA.

See the ECA/ETF Press Release http://www.eurocockpit.be/media/European_Action_Day_Crew_Fatigue1_PR_09_1002_F.pdf
 
Last edited:
Thumbs up, Polaris likes, etc etc....

Bedre føre var, penger er ikke mer verdt enn menneskeliv.
 

Nu er det vel langt flere end blot CAU der står bag:

Hvem står bag kampagnen

Vi er mange organisationer der står bag kampagnen i Danmark:
Cabin Union Denmark
Sammenslutningen af Danske Erhvervspiloter (DALPA)
Flyvebranchens Personale Union
Cabin Attendants Union
Thomas Cook Airline Pilot Union
My Cabin Union Denmark
Cimber Cabin Union
Sterling Air Kabineforening
Flyvebesætningsforeningen for Grønland
Air Greenland Cabin Union
Star Air Cockpitforening
SUN-AIR Kabineforening
SUN-AIR Pilotforening
North Flying Pilotforening
 
bra at det endelig kommer et annet talerør enn flyanalytikere som står fram i media og mener at flybesetninger skal tynes til det maksimale for å sikre investorer mest mulig inntjening. Jeg lurer på hvilke andre yrkesgrupper som helt lovlig kan planlegges å benyttes i inntil 13 timer; men med mulighet for å tyne det til 14 timer på et skift!

KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!!!!!
 
Breaking the 'Veil of Silence' – on 5 October, in 22 Countries

On Monday 5 Oct., hundreds of pilots and cabin crew members will be at European airports to inform the public that the EU has scientific evidence that EU rules on air crew fatigue are potentially unsafe. They will hand out fake boarding passes featuring cigarette-style health-warnings, detailed information on crew fatigue, and an explanation as to why EU law must be changed.

One year has passed since the EU received scientific evidence (the 'Moebus report', mandated by the EU itself). It recommends concrete legislative changes to ensure passengers and crew are protected against fatigue-related safety risks. Rather than starting to swiftly change the law, strong airline lobbying paralysed the EU into inaction. ECA and ETF say: 'Brussels' must act NOW!

Striving for highest levels of aviation safety, ETF and ECA have decided to break the 'veil of silence' and go public – at airports, in the media, and towards the EU Institutions.

"This Action Day is the first of a number of possible actions pilots and cabin crew will undertake to highlight the safety risks of crew fatigue. Inaction at EU-level has eventually triggered a reaction from the safety professionals who passengers trust. If the EU does not act, we will." warns Capt. Martin Chalk, President of ECA.

"Flight safety is the core mission of every cabin crew member. But EU-law is insufficient to ensure that air crew can perform their safety role in an alert and effective way. We know this from experience, and scientific evidence confirms it. The EU has been looking the other way for too long. This must change!" says Francois Ballestero, ETF Political Director.

"When the airlines claim there is no need to change EU fatigue rules, you start wondering what their goal is. Yes, stricter fatigue rules – as recommended by the scientists – might cost money. But safety always has a price. Do we need a fatal accident in Europe before actions are taken?" asks Philip von Schöppenthau, Secretary General of ECA.

See the ECA/ETF Press Release Breaking the 'Veil of Silence' – on 5 October, in 22 Countries

On Monday 5 Oct., hundreds of pilots and cabin crew members will be at European airports to inform the public that the EU has scientific evidence that EU rules on air crew fatigue are potentially unsafe. They will hand out fake boarding passes featuring cigarette-style health-warnings, detailed information on crew fatigue, and an explanation as to why EU law must be changed.

One year has passed since the EU received scientific evidence (the 'Moebus report', mandated by the EU itself). It recommends concrete legislative changes to ensure passengers and crew are protected against fatigue-related safety risks. Rather than starting to swiftly change the law, strong airline lobbying paralysed the EU into inaction. ECA and ETF say: 'Brussels' must act NOW!

Striving for highest levels of aviation safety, ETF and ECA have decided to break the 'veil of silence' and go public – at airports, in the media, and towards the EU Institutions.

"This Action Day is the first of a number of possible actions pilots and cabin crew will undertake to highlight the safety risks of crew fatigue. Inaction at EU-level has eventually triggered a reaction from the safety professionals who passengers trust. If the EU does not act, we will." warns Capt. Martin Chalk, President of ECA.

"Flight safety is the core mission of every cabin crew member. But EU-law is insufficient to ensure that air crew can perform their safety role in an alert and effective way. We know this from experience, and scientific evidence confirms it. The EU has been looking the other way for too long. This must change!" says Francois Ballestero, ETF Political Director.

"When the airlines claim there is no need to change EU fatigue rules, you start wondering what their goal is. Yes, stricter fatigue rules – as recommended by the scientists – might cost money. But safety always has a price. Do we need a fatal accident in Europe before actions are taken?" asks Philip von Schöppenthau, Secretary General of ECA.

See the ECA/ETF Press Release
Breaking the 'Veil of Silence' – on 5 October, in 22 Countries

On Monday 5 Oct., hundreds of pilots and cabin crew members will be at European airports to inform the public that the EU has scientific evidence that EU rules on air crew fatigue are potentially unsafe. They will hand out fake boarding passes featuring cigarette-style health-warnings, detailed information on crew fatigue, and an explanation as to why EU law must be changed.

One year has passed since the EU received scientific evidence (the 'Moebus report', mandated by the EU itself). It recommends concrete legislative changes to ensure passengers and crew are protected against fatigue-related safety risks. Rather than starting to swiftly change the law, strong airline lobbying paralysed the EU into inaction. ECA and ETF say: 'Brussels' must act NOW!

Striving for highest levels of aviation safety, ETF and ECA have decided to break the 'veil of silence' and go public – at airports, in the media, and towards the EU Institutions.

"This Action Day is the first of a number of possible actions pilots and cabin crew will undertake to highlight the safety risks of crew fatigue. Inaction at EU-level has eventually triggered a reaction from the safety professionals who passengers trust. If the EU does not act, we will." warns Capt. Martin Chalk, President of ECA.

"Flight safety is the core mission of every cabin crew member. But EU-law is insufficient to ensure that air crew can perform their safety role in an alert and effective way. We know this from experience, and scientific evidence confirms it. The EU has been looking the other way for too long. This must change!" says Francois Ballestero, ETF Political Director.

"When the airlines claim there is no need to change EU fatigue rules, you start wondering what their goal is. Yes, stricter fatigue rules – as recommended by the scientists – might cost money. But safety always has a price. Do we need a fatal accident in Europe before actions are taken?" asks Philip von Schöppenthau, Secretary General of ECA.

See the ECA/ETF Press Release http://www.eurocockpit.be/media/European_Action_Day_Crew_Fatigue1_PR_09_1002_F.pdf
Ok Ok den er gået rent ind, men 3 gange i samme post er vel ikke nødvendig
Hilsen
ole
 
14 timers arbeidsdag er jo langt over det allmindelige i Coop... Ut fra arbeidstids-bestemmelser, så skulle man nesten tro at det var viktigere for sikkerheten at de Coop-ansatte er uthvilte enn det er at piloter og kabinansatte er uthvilte. :headbang
 
Dette var på høy tid! Meget skuffet over TV2 nyhetene i går der det ikke ble nevnt med et ord. Media burde da ta mer interresse i dette... Dog jeg hørte NRK nyheter på radio hadde noe om saken?
 
Her bruker fagforeningene trusselen om dårligere sikkerhet for alt den er verd. Dette er bare en kamp om å få kortere arbeidstid på lik linje som alle andre arbeidsgrupper som vil værne om sine goder. Kommer det et forslag om at pilotene bare skal fly 5 timer så kommer nok fagforeningene til å kjempe for det også, og ingen kan si at ikke sikkerheten vil bli bedre med bare 5-timers arbeidsdag....
 
Her bruker fagforeningene trusselen om dårligere sikkerhet for alt den er verd. Dette er bare en kamp om å få kortere arbeidstid på lik linje som alle andre arbeidsgrupper som vil værne om sine goder. Kommer det et forslag om at pilotene bare skal fly 5 timer så kommer nok fagforeningene til å kjempe for det også, og ingen kan si at ikke sikkerheten vil bli bedre med bare 5-timers arbeidsdag....

... og dette har du innsikt i ?
 
BGO:
Her bruker fagforeningene trusselen om dårligere sikkerhet for alt den er verd. Dette er bare en kamp om å få kortere arbeidstid på lik linje som alle andre arbeidsgrupper som vil værne om sine goder. Kommer det et forslag om at pilotene bare skal fly 5 timer så kommer nok fagforeningene til å kjempe for det også, og ingen kan si at ikke sikkerheten vil bli bedre med bare 5-timers arbeidsdag....

Øhh... ??? Har du lest noe om dette i det hele tatt? Hvis ikke les igjennom og dersom du har lest, les en gang til :up:
 
Det er nok nærliggende å kunne anta at kommentatoren verken har vært i nærheten av en fagforening, en cockpit, eller den følelsen det er å sitte kjempende for å holde hodet oppe og oppmerksometen fokusert selv under den mest kritiske fasen av flyvningen, med flyet fullt av passasjerer som gleder seg til straks å være hjemme.

"Fagforeningen" har sagt til EU at den går med på hva som helst av flyge- og hviletidsregler, så lenge det er vitenskaplig og medisinsk bevist at de er forsvarlige. Det går ikke EU med på. Så enkelt er det.

Lakmustest: Innfør de samme arbeids- og hviletidsbegrensningene for trailersjåfører i Europa, som det allerede er innført for flygere. Trailersjåfører kan tross alt trekke inn til siden og sove hvis de er trøtt, uten annen risiko enn å miste jobben fordi de ikke kjører så mange kilometer om dagen som arbeidsgiver forventer.
 
Back
Top