Flyprat


Go Back   Flyprat > Flyteknisk forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15-07-2017, 01:28   #1
ENBO
ScanFlyer Blue
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bodø
Posts: 394
Default PW vs CFM på A32x

PW-motorene har problemer på neo til Airbus A320, Norwegian har valgt amerikansk, mens SAS CFM som ser ut til å fungere. Er det pris som er avgjørende for forskjellige valg?
ENBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2017, 01:40   #2
LN-MOW
Flyklapper
 
LN-MOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: KGVL
Posts: 48,955
Default Re: PW vs CFM på A32x

Aner ikke hva som gjorde utslaget, men her er en bra analyse av motorene.

http://www.bangaloreaviation.com/201...s-a320neo.html
__________________
Andreas Mowinckel
enfb.net
Airliners at Fornebu
Radar Station KGVL
LN-MOW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A32X - B73X forskjeller kekker Småprat 17 15-11-2014 21:32
TK bestiller 117 A32X haavig Flyforum 9 17-03-2013 13:24
CFM endrer litt på motorene til A320 LN-AFG Flyforum 0 02-09-2012 01:25
Attention: CFM Blubird Bilder & foto 7 10-02-2010 22:59


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:35.


Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Foreningen Flyprat, Scanair og bidragsytere. Enkelte ikoner fra Famfamfam CC-BY.